The book by Paul LaViolette
is a serious scientific study which examines the problem of the
interaction of solid bodies and electromagnetic fields with the
physical vacuum, taking into consideration an extremely large
portion of the theoretical and experimental knowledge of modern
physics. The need for this book has existed for a long time because
an enormous volume of experimental data accumulated during the
last half of the century in physics, chemistry, cosmology and
material science does not fit the concepts of the more familiar
theories of quantum mechanics, plasma physics, superconductivity,
light as well asEinstein's general and special relativity theories.
The scientific world in the 21st century continues
to develop in accordance with the laws of dialectics, the general
volume of data in the field of physics eliciting a transformation
wherein quantitative changes evoke qualitative ones to result
in new theories. One of these overwhelming theories is the theory
of the "physical vacuum" or ether, in other words the
theory proposing that sub-atomic particles fill all the space
around us and actively interact with material objects and fields,
changing their properties, energy, and speed, and directly influencing
physical and chemical reactions. The appearance of such terms
as physical vacuum, vacuum polarization and vacuum energy fluctuations
was met by many scientists as a challenge to existing theories
and for many years these terms were not accepted by official
science. Many aspects of the statements about the physical vacuum
were considered to contradict the "logical statements"
of quantum mechanics, Einstein's theory and the Second Law of
Thermodynamics. At the same time physicists preferred not to
discuss the well known and extremely great contradictions that
exist between quantum mechanics and Einstein's theories. As all
modern electronic science is based on quantum mechanics and as
nuclear energy is based on Einstein's formulas, both of these
approaches were considered flawless and attempts to explain the
mechanism of physical phenomena in terms that have used new approaches,
have been punished severely.
Nevertheless, a large volume articles in serious
magazines in the USA, in Europe, and in Russia have concluded
that the question of understanding the physical vacuum is the
greatest problem of modern physics and deserves careful consideration.
Besides, practically all of the physicists of the 19th and 20th
centuries, including Einstein, accepted the existence of an ether.
The investigation of the physical vacuum is
important for several reasons: it allows us to eliminate the
various contradictions of modern physics because it describes
the interaction of elementary particles, formulates the main
concepts and the laws of the world of sub-atomic particles, describes
the processes of energy exchange, explains the mechanism of generation
and propagation of electromagnetic, nuclear and gravity fields,
and the initial creation of matter. Therefore it introduces the
possibility of using the energy of the vacuum for the elaboration
of new, unique technologies in physics and chemistry and allows
us to operate directly with the structure of a solid body and,
based on entirely new principles, to extract energy with an efficiency
several orders of magnitude higher than that achieved at present.
The detailed understanding of the mechanism
of gravity will allow us to use this knowledge for the creation
of a fast communication network as well as for the creation of
new flying vehicles, and the elaboration of new methods of building
technology and cargo transportation. The main questions of the
energy of the physical vacuum have been addressed in articles
by American scientists, such as Bernard Haisch, Harald Puthoff
and Alfonso Rueda. Their works in the field of zero point energy
fluctuations of the vacuum can be regarded as a classical approach
to this field of knowledge. The extremely serious work of Dr.
Dyatlov from Russia concerning the polarization of the physical
vacuum can be considered as a practical continuation of these
theories.
The book on subquantum kinetics by Paul LaViolette
is one of the first profound works in this field. Usually the
analysis of the corresponding material requires complex mathematical
equations, and many articles typically contain an abundance of
integrals, which doesn't always help to reveal the essence of
the physical phenomena. A great merit of Paul LaViolette is his
ability to discuss the main features of the subatomic world without
using complex mathematics and while preserving a rigorous logic
in his arguments and conclusions. That doesn't mean that the
book is primitive. On the contrary, in order to understand the
full scope of the discussed phenomena, it is helpful to have
a profound knowledge of solid state physics, electricity, optics,
chemistry, and elementary particle physics.
This book should be of value to various physicists
ranging from professors to students of technical universities
and is an important manual for engineers and researchers as it
contains the information and background for inspiring new experimental
works. There are grounds to recommend this monograph as a compulsory
textbook for students of the physical sciences because without
knowledge of the main aspects of subquantum kinetics, modern
physics will not adequately develop as a science and also because
the detailed understanding of physical phenomena and their complex
interrelations is a basic requirement for every expert in the
field of physics.
On the other hand, if we analyze this book
taking into consideration only well-known scientific facts, it
may seem that the problem of subquantum physics doesn't exist.
Up to the present, vacuum has widely been regarded as an absolutely
empty space or nothing. Students were taught using this approach,
many Ph. D. degrees were earned, and everything seemed to be
fine, but frankly speaking, there has been little progress in
the field of physics during the past 40 years. Meanwhile, the
communication with spacecraft on the surface of Mars is based
on electromagnetic waves. The wave, by conventional definition,
is a distortion of space; if there is no space, there is nothing
to distort. According to Einstein, gravitation is a geometrical
bending of space-time, and we accept it. But if space is absolute
emptiness, it is impossible to bend it. This is pure logic. But
if we refer to the handbook for physics, we will find that an
empty vacuum has more than 10 different characteristics, including
a dielectric constant, modulus of elasticity, magnetic permeability
coefficient, magnetic susceptibility, modulus of conductance,
a characteristic electromagnetic wave impedance of 377 Ohms,
and other values. Isn't that much for an absolutely empty space?
From my discussions with nuclear physics experts
at accelerators in Dubna, also from CERN and Fermi National Labs,
I understood that all of them accept the idea of a physical vacuum
not as a theory, but as an experimental fact. This approach is
shared by many NASA experts and by a large fraction of the researchers
from American, Russian and European universities.
In autumn of 2002, there appeared a book by
Dr. Bearden "Energy from vacuum" having a length of
977 pages and it has become a bestseller in the scientific media,
despite its price of over 100$. Thomas Bearden, retired colonel,
who has diplomas in nuclear physics, mathematics, and engineering,
presents an analysis of 30 years of his studies in the field
of new technologies and energy production. The impact of this
work is great and it's influence on modern readers can't be denied,
but with all its good qualities, this book is more a popular
than a scientific one, and the author didn't have the intention
of giving a profound scientific approach. Although the book by
Paul LaViolette, , doesn't contain nice color illustrations,
it nevertheless concentrates on the scientific analysis and comparison
of mechanisms and interactions between sub-atomic particles and
ordinary matter and is therefore an extremely important and useful
tool. This book teaches us how to think about and understand
the physics and the nature around us, and more importantly -
this is just a beginning, one that provides the basis for further
development, further study, and new experiments, following a
systematic and scientific approach. There is no doubt that this
book is an outstanding contribution to modern physics and that
it will receive the attention and appreciation of many thankful
readers.
Evgeny Podkletnov, Ph.D.,
Tech.D., Professor of chemistry
Tampere, Finland