|
LaViolette has authored
seven books: Subquantum
Kinetics, Genesis
of the Cosmos, Earth
Under Fire, Galactic
Superwaves and their Impact on the Earth, Decoding
the Message of the Pulsars, and Secrets
of Antigravity Propulsion. He is also editor of
a book of essays by Ludwig von Bertalanffy entitled A
Systems View of Man. He has also authored numerous technical
papers as well as several magazine articles on a variety of subjects,
systems science, physics, astronomy, cosmology, SETI, aerospace
propulsion, geology, paleontology, educational psychology, stock
market theory, and solar energy. He speaks at universities
and symposia around the world about his research findings. He
also holds patents on a novel breathing bag system for closed-circuit
breathing apparatus.
LaViolette has served
as the president and director of the Starburst Foundation since
its founding in 1984. The
Starburst Foundation is a nonprofit scientific research institute
carrying out research in physics astronomy, cosmology, climatology,
geology, and alternative energy. A listing of the institutional
affiliations of people requesting information on Starburst's
research (as of 1988) is posted here (affiliations).
Work
Systems
Physics
LaViolette
is the developer of subquantum
kinetics, a novel approach to microphysics. It is the first
unified field theory to propose an omnipresent, open, reaction-diffusion
system as the substrate for physical existence (matter and energy).
It not only accounts for electric, magnetic, gravitational,
nuclear, and weak forces in a unified manner, but also resolves
many long-standing problems in physics such as the field singularity
problem, the wave-particle dualism, and the field source problem,
to mention a few. Among other things, it accounts for galactic
core explosions, supernovae, stellar pulsation, the electrogravitic
propulsion phenomenon, and leads to a continuous creation cosmology
that effectively replaces the big bang theory. Subquantum
kinetics was also the first microphysics methodology to incorporate
general systems principles similar to those applicable to living
systems. The theory is also compatible with the process
metaphysics developed by Alfred North Whitehead. In 1985,
the International Journal of General Systems devoted an
entire journal issue to the theory's exposition under the title
"Special
Issue on Systems Thinking in Physics."[4] The March 3, 1986 issue of the
Brain/Mind Bulletin published a favorable article about LaViolette's
theory. Scientists from around the world requested that
LaViolette send them a reprint of this issue: a
partial listing of names of scientists requesting reprints.
Dennis Pakula makes extensive reference to subquantum kinetics
in his excellent book New
Story, New God where his discussion of the nature of
the physical universe and its ultimate spiritual nature draws
heavily upon the subquantum kinetics paradigm.
Cosmology
LaViolette
is the first to show that the tired-light, stationary universe
hypothesis fits cosmological test data better than the big bang,
expanding universe hypothesis, on four different cosmology tests.
The results of this test confirmed a key prediction of
his subquantum kinetics physics theory (SQK Prediction No. 3). He published his findings
in the February 1986 issue of the Astrophysical Journal.[8] His paper received mention in
the August 1986 issue of Astronomy
Magazine.[9] This was considered a landmark paper by
many astronomers opposed to the big bang theory. Examples
include Grote Reber, the father of radio astronomy (letter),[10] J. P. Vigier, professor of physics
at the Henri Poincare Institute, Director of Research at CNRS
and Louis deBroglie's former lab assistant (letter,
letter),[11,
12] Jean-Claude
Pecker, professor at the College of France and member of the
French National Academy of Sciences, who wrote that he was to
mention LaViolette's paper very favorably at the Nobel Symposium
in Stolkholm and at the Bejing Symposium (letter,
letter),[12,
13] Georges
de Vaucouleur, a well known astronomer and professor at the University
of Texas at Austin (letter),[14] Paul Marmet, a member of the
National Research Council of Canada (letter),[15] and Dean Turner, professor of
physics at the University of Northern Colorado (letter).[16] Up to the present date,
20 refereed citations have been made to this paper. For
15 years this paper stood unchallenged. Then, in 2001 two
studies were published claiming to present data that refuted
the tired-light model.[17] However, in the 2003 update to his book
Subquantum Kinetics, LaViolette subsequently showed that
the data of one of those studies, the Tolman test, actually confirms
the tired-light model and that the second study, which is based
on the duration of supernova light curves, is flawed due to the
presence of data selection effects.[6]
|