http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-10-galaxies-gently.html
Observations of low concentrations of heavy elements in the centers of primordial galaxies are being interpreted as evidence of gas accretion from the galaxy’s surroundings and condensation in central region to explain galaxy formation and growth. Could this instead be interpreted as evidence of new matter expulsion from central region as evidence of continuous matter creation in primordial galaxies?
Answer to your question: The astronomers reporting these SINFONI spectrometer findings have no direct evidence that these primordial galaxies are accreting hydrogen. This interpretation is made because the standard theory must somehow explain why primordial galaxies are smaller than contemporary nearby galaxies. The early finding by the Hubble Telescope for the presence of galaxy size evolution actually provides a confirmation of the subquantum kinetics (SQK) continuous creation cosmology over the big bang cosmology which predicts no such size evolution (see the posted list of subquantum kinetics prediction confirmations). So astronomers have been trying to find ways of modifying standard cosmology to allow it to grow galaxies. Their finding that primordial galaxies have low heavy metal abundances does not really prove that they are being flooded with hydrogen gas. So this inference seems very weak. On the other hand, the observation that heavy metal abundances in primordial galaxies are low provides strong support for the SQK continuous creation cosmology. That is, primordial galaxies should not have had as much time to synthesize heavy metals, either through thermonuclear fusion processes or parthenogenic matter transmutation processes that would continuously take place within stars.
Paul LaViolette, January 28, 2011